The surgical management of a patient with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and cataracts.

Objective: To report the two different surgical approaches in the case of a patient with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy with low endothelial cell count and advanced cataracts. Methods: The chosen surgical approach differed between eyes, with the right eye undergoing a combined approach consisting of cataract surgery, intraocular lens implantation, and penetrating keratoplasty in 2022. One year later, for the left eye, a different approach was decided: cataract surgery followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). The Descemet membrane graft was prepared by the surgeon using the liquid bubble technique. AS-OCT was used to monitor the patient before and after surgery. Results: Visual recovery was excellent for both eyes, however, visual acuity improved quickly in the left eye (DMEK), while, in the right eye (PK), the best corrected visual acuity was reached after several months post-surgery. Conclusion: Advanced stages of Fuchs dystrophy patients will most likely need corneal transplantation. Each type of corneal transplantation procedure comes with unique challenges, both intraoperative and postoperative. DMEK is a very good treatment option for patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, with excellent visual recovery and good graft survival at the 10-year mark. Abbreviations: DMEK = Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, PK = penetrating keratoplasty, AS-OCT = anterior segment optical coherence tomography, FECD = Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, US = ultrasound, CDE = cumulative dissipated energy, IOL = intraocular lens.

Epithelial ingrowth in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty associated with vitreous loss.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ingrowth is a rare but potentially sight-threatening complication caused by the invasion of corneal or conjunctival epithelial cells into the eye during ocular surgeries. DMEK is emerging as a widely used surgery for endothelial keratoplasty with its improved safety profile. We describe a case of epithelial ingrowth in the graft-host interface after uneventful DMEK associated with vitreous prolapse in the anterior chamber. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old female with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent DMEK for corneal decompensation following cataract surgery. During the DMEK procedure, vitreous prolapse was observed around the intraocular lens (IOL). Her early postoperative course was unremarkable, but a dense paracentral interface opacity was observed during the 3-month follow-up. The area of epithelial ingrowth was imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a uniform nodule with a discrete increase in interface hyperreflectivity. A low-energy YAG laser was applied to remove the opacity. She maintained good vision and clear cornea without reoccurrence after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that, in addition to the introduction of epithelial cells during surgery, vitreous retention in the anterior chamber may be a risk factor by providing a scaffold that potentially aggravates epithelial ingrowth in DMEK. Our case demonstrated that early YAG intervention may disrupt interface epithelial cell growth, and the transmitted laser energy may fragment the scaffold vitreous noninvasively.

[Outcomes of hemi-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and phacoemulsification for the treatment of primary Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy combined with cataract]. / Rezul'taty transplantatsii destsemetovoi membrany s endoteliem i fakoemul'sifikatsii pri pervichnoi endotelial'noi distrofii rogovitsy Fuksa, sochetannoi s kataraktoi.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the long-term results of surgical treatment of patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy and cataract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 24 patients (24 eyes) with primary Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy and cataract, who underwent cataract phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a semicircular graft (hemi-DMEK). The effect of treatment was assessed by best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell density (ECD). RESULTS: In total, surgical treatment involved 14 donor corneas that were divided in half during the preparation and isolation of the Descemet's membrane (DM). By month 12 after the surgery an increase in visual functions and graft transparency were observed in 23 patients (23 eyes) out of 24. Repeated keratoplasty was required in one case due to fibrosis of the posterior layers of recipient's corneal stroma. At 12 months postoperatively, the study group showed an increase in BCVA from 0.16±0.1 to 0.75±20, a decrease in CCT from 650.9±4.5 µm to 519.6±43.9, and a decreased in ECD from 2850.5±84.7 cells/mm2 up to 1285.5±277.2 cells/mm2. Thus, the loss of endothelial cells at one year after surgery amounted to 54.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The developed method for transplantation of a semicircular DM fragment provides a tissue-saving approach to endothelial keratoplasty, and considering the high percentage of transparent engraftment of grafts and complete visual rehabilitation, it can be recommended in the treatment of patients with cataract and Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.

One-year Outcomes of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Cataract Surgery in the Korean Population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcomes after ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (triple procedure) in the South Korean population. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 37 eyes of 36 patients who underwent the UT-DSAEK triple procedure between 2012 and 2021 in a single tertiary hospital. Preoperative and postoperative refractive outcomes and endothelial parameters at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were observed. RESULTS: At the final postoperative 12-month period, the average best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 ± 0.5 in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. The mean endothelial cell density at 12 months was 1,841.92 ± 731.24 cells/mm2, indicating no significant endothelial cell loss compared to the baseline (p = 0.128). The mean postoperative central corneal thickness at 12 months was 597.41 ± 86.26 µm. The postoperative mean absolute error at 12 months was 0.96 ± 0.89 diopters (D) and mean error was 0.89 ± 0.97 D. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our South Korean cohort study on UT-DSAEK triple surgery showed favorable and safe outcomes. Regardless of graft thickness, it should be noted that a hyperopic shift of 1.00 to 2.00 D needs to be considered in the case of UT-DSAEK triple surgery.

Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial 1 (DETECT 1): outcome masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing two types of corneal transplant surgeries and effect of rho kinase inhibitors on endothelial cell loss protocol.

BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain which endothelial keratoplasty (EK) technique yields the best outcomes while maintaining safety, particularly in eyes with coexisting ocular conditions. Moreover, the impact of endothelial cell loss (ECL) on long-term graft survival requires further investigation. Adjuvant ripasudil, a rho kinase inhibitor, may address the challenge of ECL in corneal transplantation. This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial 1 (DETECT 1), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, four-arm clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 160 eligible patients with endothelial dysfunction will be enrolled from five participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 2×2 factorial design to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-ultrathin Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) plus topical ripasudil 0.4%; group 2-UT-DSAEK plus topical placebo; group 3-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) plus topical ripasudil 0.4% and group 4-DMEK plus topical placebo. Primary outcomes include the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months and ECL at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include visual acuity at different time points, vision-related quality of life, endothelial cell morphology and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression models, taking into account the treatment arms and relevant covariates. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, graft failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. CONCLUSION: DETECT I aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of UT-DSAEK and DMEK, as well as the potential benefits of adjuvant topical ripasudil in reducing ECL. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising corneal transplantation techniques and improving long-term graft survival, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A data and safety monitoring committee (DSMC) has been empaneled by the NEI.All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record.This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request.

Ten-Year Changes in Vision, Refractive Error, and Corneal Thickness After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, and central corneal thickness (CCT) during the first decade after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: Outcomes of all consecutive eyes undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) were reviewed; eyes with untreatable comorbidities before DSAEK were excluded. DSAEK was performed through a temporal incision and all eyes were pseudophakic postoperatively. Changes in BCVA, manifest spherical equivalent, manifest cylinder (vector analysis), and CCT were assessed by using generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: BCVA improved between 6 months (0.18 ± 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR); Snellen equivalent, 20/30) and 5 years (0.10 ± 0.10 logMAR; 20/25; n = 74, P < 0.001) and then remained stable at 10 years (0.09 ± 0.10 logMAR, n = 48, P = 0.22). There was a myopic shift of -0.20 ± 0.51 D between 6 months and 5 years (n = 65, P = 0.002) that remained stable at 10 years (-0.09 ± 0.44 D; 20/25; n = 34, P = 0.33). Manifest cylinder drifted with-the-rule between 6 months and 5 years (n = 65, P < 0.001) and between 5 and 10 years (n = 34, P < 0.001). CCT was stable between 6 months (672 ± 57 µm) and 5 years (677 ± 55 µm, n = 67, P = 0.47), but increased at 10 years (702 ± 60 µm, n = 39, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent BCVA can be achieved during the first decade after DSAEK for FECD, although improvement seems to plateau after 5 years. Changes in manifest refractive error were not clinically significant. The gradual increase in CCT was consistent with longer-term changes found after other types of keratoplasty.

The outcomes of postoperative eye patching after cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of post-operative eye patching on corneal thickness, endothelial cells' loss and visual acuity in patients diagnosed Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). SETTING: Public healthcare centre, Shamir Medical Centre, Israel. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included patients with FECD undergoing routine cataract surgery in a public medical centre. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the eye undergoing surgery was covered with a patch for 24 h in the first group (patched group), and a plastic shield was used in the second (non-patched group). Both groups received a unique dose of a local steroid and antibiotic post-operatively. The eyes were examined pre-operatively, and on days 1, 7 and 30 post-surgery . Examination included: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), comeplete slit lamp examination, intra ocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT) using the IOL Master 700 (Zeiss, Germany) and endothelial cell density (ECD) using Specular microscopy. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and operation time were recorded for all cases. RESULTS: The study included 46 eyes of 46 patients diagnosed with FECD. Twenty-three eyes in the patched group, and 23 eyes in the non-patched group . Thirty days post-operatively the CCT in the patched group decreased by 60 ± 38 mµ (9%) compared to 92 ± 80 mµ (13.5%) in the non- patched group (p = 0.04). Seven days post-operatively the CCT in the patched group decreased by 31 ± 35 mµ (5%) compared to 58 ± 76 (8%) in the non-patched group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.081). There was no statistically significant difference in endothelial cells loss as well as BCVA at 1, 7 and 30 days post-operatively between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding eye patch post-operatively after cataract surgery in patients with FECD results in better corneal clarity recovery and reduced corneal edema one month post-operatively. Visual acuity and endothelial cell's loss were not influenced by patching.

Corneal Guttae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report on the occurrence of corneal guttae after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 13 eyes of 13 patients who underwent DMEK at 2 tertiary referral centers between 2007 and 2021 (average available follow-up 73 ± 52 months, range 18-174 months) and showed corneal guttae during postoperative examinations were included. Eye bank images were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Occurrence of guttae was observed by specular microscopy in 13 eyes. In 11 cases, presence of guttae was confirmed by confocal microscopy and in 1 case by histology. Five eyes showed an increase in guttae density during the postoperative course. Surgery indications were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (n = 11), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n = 1), and DMEK graft failure after allograft rejection (n = 1); the latter eye had shown no signs of guttae after primary DMEK. Two eyes with guttae required a repeat DMEK due to graft failure. At the last available follow-up, all 11 remaining eyes had clear corneas and 10 eyes had a best-corrected visual acuity of ≥0.9 (decimal). During donor cornea processing in the eye bank, no guttae were observed on the donor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal guttae can occur after DMEK including in eyes operated for indications other than Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and most likely guttae were present on the donor graft but were not detectable by routine slit-lamp and light microscopy evaluation in the eye bank. Postoperative guttae density varies among patients and especially small isolated guttae do not seem to affect clinical outcomes.

Combined or sequential DMEK in cases of cataract and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (sequential DMEK) and DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (combined DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and cataract. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Literature searches were conducted in Medline and Scopus. Comparative studies reporting sequential DMEK and combined DMEK in FECD patients were included. The main outcome measure of the study was the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improvement. Secondary outcomes were postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate and primary graft failure rate. Bias risk was assessed and a quality appraisal of the body of evidence was completed using the Cochrane Robin-I tool. A total of 667 eyes (5 studies) were included in this review, 292 eyes (43.77%) underwent a combined DMEK, while 375 (56.22%) eyes underwent a sequential DMEK surgery. We found no evidence of a difference between the two groups (mean difference, 95% CI) regarding: (1) CDVA improvement (-0.06; -0.14, 0.03 LogMAR; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86); (2) postoperative ECD (-62; -190, 67 cells/mm2 ; 4 studies, I2 : 67%; p = 0.35); (3) rebubbling (risks ratio: 1.04; 0.59, 1.85; 4 studies, I2 : 48%; p = 0.89); and primary graft failure rate (risks ratio: 0.91; 0.32, 2.57; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86). Of all the 5 non-randomized studies, all (100%) were graded as low quality. The overall quality of the analysed studies was low. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm no difference or superiority of one approach in terms of CDVA, endothelial cell count and postoperative complication rate between the two arms.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of DSEK and DMEK in Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the long-term endothelial cell loss, graft survival, and clinical outcomes in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using a standardized surgical protocol. METHODS: Three hundred and six consecutive DSEK and DMEK grafts of 223 patients with FED performed by 8 surgeons between January 2006 and August 2022 were analyzed. The primary outcome measures were graft survival, endothelial cell loss, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. RESULTS: At 5 years, graft survival was 96% for both DSEK and DMEK eyes. The mean percentage of endothelial cell loss was 57.7 ± 17.1 in DSEK and 56.8 ± 15.2 in DMEK eyes ( P = 0.430). The mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.13 ± 0.14 logMAR in DSEK and 0.01 ± 0.18 logMAR in DMEK grafts ( P <0.00001) at 5 years postoperatively. Rebubbling was performed in 7.8% DSEK and 2.1% DMEK grafts ( P = 0.441). Cox regression identified rejection episodes (HR 6.5; 95% CI: 1.70-24.8; P = 0.0062) as a significant contributing factor for graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK had superior visual acuity outcomes compared with DSEK in these patients up to 5 years after surgery. At 5 years, there was no significant difference in graft survival or endothelial cell loss between DSEK and DMEK eyes with FED. We propose that our standardized technique reduces the need for rebubbling.

Emerging treatments for corneal endothelium decompensation - a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is the conventional treatment to improve visual acuity of corneal endothelium decompensation (CED) patients, with other therapies mainly for symptomatic relief. However, the shortage of corneal grafts and other limitations to EK urge the development of novel alternative treatments. In the last decade, novel options have been proposed, yet only a limited number of reviews have systematically reported on outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review evaluates the existing clinical evidence of novel surgical approaches for CED. METHOD: We identified 24 studies that illustrated the clinical observations of the surgical approaches in interest. We included Descemet stripping only (DSO), Descemet membrane transplantation (DMT) where Descement membrane alone instead of corneal endothelium with cells is transplanted, and cell-based therapy. RESULTS: In general, these therapies may provide visual outcomes comparable with EK under specific conditions. DSO and DMT target CED with relatively healthy peripheral corneal endothelium like Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy, while cell-based therapy offers more versatile applications. Side effects of DSO would decrease with modifications to surgical techniques. Moreover, Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor adjuvant therapy could enhance clinical results in DSO and cell-based therapy. CONCLUSION: Long-term controlled clinical trials with larger sample size on the therapies are needed. The simplicity of DSO and the high translational potential of cell-based therapy to treat CED of most etiologies made these two treatment strategies promising.

Comparison of efficacy of three gases for anterior chamber tamponade in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of three different gases for intraocular tamponade: 100% air, 10% perfluoropropane (C3F8), and 10% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 138 patients who underwent DMEK were reviewed retrospectively, with the primary outcome being the rebubbling rate in the first week following surgery. Other clinical outcomes, such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), incidence of rebubbling after the first week, endothelial cell density (ECD), graft detachment, graft failure, pupillary block, and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 138 patients, 57 were in group 1 (treated with air), 44 in group 2 (treated with 10% C3F8), and 37 in group 3 (treated with 10% SF6). Group 3 showed significantly lower rates of graft detachment and rebubbling compared to groups 1 and 2 (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative BCVA among the groups. At one year, the mean endothelial cell loss was 32% in group 1, 30% in group 2, and 33% in group 3 (P=0.715). One patient in group 1 experienced pupillary block and increased IOP, while there were no such occurrences in the other groups. There was no difference between the groups in terms of graft failure. CONCLUSION: The use of 10% SF6 in DMEK surgery may be a good option due to its efficacy in preventing graft detachment, low rebubbling rate, and potential for minimizing complications.

New forceps free injection technique for delivering descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty preloaded endothelium-in grafts.

PURPOSE: To describe a new method for delivering DMEK grafts into the recipient's eye with endothelium inward configuration using a no-forceps injection technique. METHODS: We retrospectively review 11 patients that underwent DMEK surgery at our institution using a no-forceps injection technique. The graft was preloaded into an intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge and connected to an anterior chamber maintainer (ACM). A 5 ml non luer lock syringe was inserted into the other end of the ACM to create a one-flow system. The cartridge was inserted into the posterior end of an injector, and the graft was successfully delivered into the recipient's eye. RESULT: Twelve eyes of 11 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 9.16 ± 1.3 months. At baseline, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.76 ± 0.13 logMAr and mean endothelial cell density (ECD) was 2619.00 ± 115.89 cells/mm2. At follow-up, BCVA significantly improved to 0.22 ± 0.05 logMAR (p = 0.003). Although we observed a significant reduction in ECD at follow-up (1688 ± 182.20, p = 0.002), our patients lost only 35.69 ± 6.36% of endothelial cells. CONCLUSION: Our technique can help surgeons safely deliver an endothelium-in graft into the recipient's eye. The method doesn't require the use of a forceps, minimizing the risk of endothelial cell loss or graft damage.

Association Between Indication for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Rural Residency.

PURPOSE: Residing in rural locations can be a barrier to health care access. This study investigated the impact of residing in rural and small town (RST) areas on Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) indications and outcomes in Atlantic Canada. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis examined consecutive DSAEKs performed in Nova Scotia between 2017 and 2020. Patient rurality was determined by the Statistical Area Classification system developed by Statistics Canada. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess for factors associated with DSAEK indication, including repeat keratoplasty, RST residence status, and travel time. RESULTS: Of 271 DSAEKs during the study period, 87 (32.1%) were performed on the eyes of RST residents. The median postoperative follow-up time was 1.6 years. Undergoing DSAEK for a previous failed keratoplasty was not associated with a higher odds of RST residency (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-1.16; P = 0.13) but was associated with travel time (OR, 0.78 for each increasing hour of travel; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99; P = 0.044). RST residency was not associated with the occurrence of graft failure (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.17; P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Residing in a rural area in Atlantic Canada was not associated with DSAEK graft failure. Repeat endothelial keratoplasty was associated with shorter travel time for corneal surgery but not rural residency status. Further research in this field could inform regional health strategies aimed at improving equity and accessibility to ophthalmology subspecialist care.

Identification and Analysis of Primary Cilia in the Corneal Endothelial Cells of Patients with Bullous Keratopathy.

PURPOSE: To identify primary cilia in human corneal endothelial cells (CECs) obtained from patients with bullous keratopathy (BK). METHODS: This study involved CEC specimens obtained from 10 eyes of 10 consecutive patients (three males and seven females; mean age: 74.5 years, range: 68-90 years) with BK who underwent Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty at Baptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan between August 2019 and September 2020. Three corneal buttons obtained from 3 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus were used as 'non-BK' controls. All specimens were evaluated with immunofluorescence staining using an antibody against acetylated α-tubulin. RESULTS: Ciliary expression was observed in six of the 10 CEC specimens; i.e. in two specimens obtained from BK patients after glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy), in two specimens obtained from patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and in two specimens obtained from a patient with BK after laser iridotomy for primary angle closure. There was acetylated α-tubulin staining but no hair-like structures in two specimens, and ciliary expression was unknown in two specimens due to the absence of cells. The length of the primary cilia varied between all specimens. In contrast, no primary cilia were observed in the corneal buttons obtained from the three keratoconus patients. CONCLUSION: The findings in this study clearly demonstrate the expression of primary cilia in the CECs of patients afflicted with BK.

Retrospective Study of Preoperative Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Versus Intraoperative Surgical Peripheral Iridectomy in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and surgical peripheral iridectomy (SPI) for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and DMEK with cataract extraction (triple DMEK). METHODS: This retrospective interventional study included 135 eyes of 135 patients who underwent DMEK alone or triple DMEK. Primary outcomes were graft detachments necessitating rebubbling, repeat grafts, and pupillary block. The secondary outcomes included rejection, cystoid macular edema, uveitis, intraoperative hyphema, visual disturbances, and surgical time. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes in the LPI group and 104 eyes in the SPI group were included. Fifty-six eyes had DMEK alone, and 79 had triple DMEK. Visually significant graft detachments occurred in 7 of 31 eyes in the LPI group versus 19 of 104 eyes in the SPI group ( P = 0.61). No statistical significance in DMEK alone versus triple DMEK groups ( P = 0.61 vs. P > 0.99). Two patients in the LPI group and 5 in the SPI group required regraft ( P = 0.66). One (3.2%) experienced pupillary block compared with 5 (4.8%) ( P = 0.99) in the LPI and SPI groups, respectively. Secondary outcomes were similar in both groups ranging from 0% to 3% ( P > 0.99). None had visual disturbances. In DMEK alone, duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the LPI versus SPI group (32.8 vs. 44.1 minutes, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated similar outcomes between LPI and SPI, although the LPI group had a shorter duration of surgery when DMEK was performed alone. The remainder of the outcomes demonstrated no statistically significant differences.

Effect of Simultaneous Endothelial Keratoplasty and Cataract Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial.

PURPOSE: Combining cataract surgery with endothelial keratoplasty (triple EK) is a common practice and may be safer because it commits the patient to only one surgery. This study aimed to determine whether outcomes of pseudophakic endothelial keratoplasty and triple EK have similar outcomes. METHODS: This was a non-prespecified secondary analysis of a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Enrollment centers included the Casey Eye Institute at Oregon Health and Sciences University and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University. Patients with damaged or diseased endothelium and were considered good candidates for either Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty or ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty were randomized to one of the two surgeries 1-2 days prior to surgery. If the patient had a cataract, they underwent simultaneous cataract surgery. The primary outcome was visual acuity at 6 months. Visual acuity at 3, 12, and 24 months, 3, 6, 12, and 24 month endothelial cell density and intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Those who had pseudophakic EK generally were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to have worse baseline vision with higher corneal densitometry values. After controlling for baseline visual acuity and type of keratoplasty, those that underwent Triple-EK had 0.09 better LogMAR lines better visual acuity at 6 (95% CI -0.17 to -0.10; P = 0.02) and 12 months (95% CI -0.21 to -0.07; P = 0.03). Although those receiving Triple- EK had nearly one-half LogMAR line better visual acuity at 24 months, it was no longer statistically significant (95% CI -0.20 to -0.05; P = 0.36). There was no statistically significant difference in ECD between groups at any timepoint. Those undergoing triple EK were more likely to have at least one adverse event (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Earlier intervention with Triple-EK may improve visual acuity outcomes after endothelial keratoplasty compared with staged procedures, but may also increase the risks of adverse events including the need for re-bubble.

Five-year clinical outcomes of 107 consecutive DMEK surgeries.

PURPOSE: The long-term clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and graft survival of Descemet-membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remain poorly understood. We retrospectively assessed these variables in all consecutive eyes that underwent DMEK for any indication in 2014-2018. The findings were compared to the long-term DMEK studies of five other groups (3-10-year follow-up). METHODS: Patients underwent ophthalmological tests preoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months, and then annually. Five-year graft survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimator. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial-cell density (ECD), and central-corneal thickness (CCT) at each timepoint was determined. RESULTS: 107 eyes (80 patients; 72 years old; 67% female) underwent first-time DMEK for uncomplicated Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94% of eyes), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (3%), and regraft after previous keratoplasty (3%). The most common complication was graft detachment requiring rebubbling (18%). Thirteen grafts (12%) failed at ≤15 months. Cumulative 5-year graft-survival probability was 88% (95% confidence intervals = 79-94%). BCVA improved from 0.6 logMAR preoperatively to 0.05 logMAR at 1 year (p<0.0001) and then remained stable. Donor ECD dropped by 47% at 6 postoperative months and then continued to decrease by 4.0%/year. Five-year endothelial-cell loss was 65% (from 2550 to 900 cells/mm2). CCT dropped from 618 to 551 µm at 5 years (p<0.0001). These findings are generally consistent with previous long-term DMEK studies. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK has low complication and high graft-survival rates and excellent clinical outcomes that persist up to 5 years post-surgery. DMEK seems to be a safe and effective treatment in the long term.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty compared with ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: This study aims to compare the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) in patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction due to Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis using a literature search of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP databases. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that compared DMEK and UT-DSAEK (graft<130 µm), with a follow-up of ≥12 months, published until 20 February 2022. We used the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies-of Interventions system for cohort studies. RESULTS: Out of 144 records, 8 studies (3 RCTs, 2 fellow-eye studies and 3 cohort studies) were included, encompassing 376 eyes, (N=187 DMEK vs N=189 UT-DSAEK). The 12-month logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was better post-DMEK (mean difference -0.06 (95% CI -0.10 to -0.02)), but with higher rebubbling risk: OR 2.76 (95% CI 1.46 to 5.22). Heterogeneity was significant I2=57%. Findings were consistent when excluding retrospective studies, including only studies with low risk of bias or RCTs only. An analysis of studies with mean DSAEK grafts <70 µm showed no significant difference in BCVA between the procedures. Publication bias was found in the BCVA analysis (Egger's test p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Post-DMEK BCVA is superior to post-UT-DSAEK when using <130 µm grafts. DSAEK grafts <70 µm may not significantly differ from DMEK. The higher risk of rebubbling with DMEK necessitates an appropriate selection of patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022340805.

Corneal grafting.

Corneal grafting is performed approximately 650 times a year in Denmark. A summary of these procedures is given in this review. Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy are frequent indications for transplantation. Previously, penetrating keratoplasty was the technique of choice but is nowadays mainly used for combined stromal and endothelial pathology. Instead, techniques specifically replacing diseased layers are more common. The Danish Cornea Bank is the only center in Denmark which undertakes preparation and distribution of tissue. The operative procedures are performed at Aarhus University Hospital or Rigshospitalet Glostrup.